﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Communicate! / Candis Forum / Are traffic speed cameras a liability? </title><generator>InstantForum.NET v4.1.3</generator><description>Communicate!</description><link>http://candis-forum.publishingmedia.co.uk/</link><webMaster>customer@candis.co.uk</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:02:56 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>Speed Cameras - Police State Nannyism</title><link>http://candis-forum.publishingmedia.co.uk/Topic246-59-1.aspx</link><description>Nigel Humphries from the ABD says "that accidents have not fallen" - in fact it is the British Medical Journal research that states this showing that hospital road accident figures do not match the police figures.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Meredydd Hughes says "Some people say that braking suddenly when they see a safety camera can cause more accidents. For one thing, they shouldn't be speeding in the first place.." he clearly is locked in his politically correct ivory tower here and gives us the 'spin', the truth is in these cases people brake first as a precaution regardless to the speed they are travelling and then look at their speedometer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He also says "There is no record of fatalities due to location of safety cameras." but that is because the police do everything possible to cover up speed camera ineffectiveness - take the number of inaccuracies reported in mobile cameras for instance yet these are ignored and I wonder how many wrongful convictions occur as a result - but Mr Hughes and comrades care not one jot if this is the case as long as the money keeps rolling in.</description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 11:40:28 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>